In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, two disciplines stand out: Detection Engineering and Threat Hunting. While they share common objectives and often employ similar tools, their methodologies and focuses diverge significantly. This article aims to illuminate the distinctive attributes of each discipline while addressing their inherent interplay.
Detection Engineering: Reinforcing the Defenses
Detection engineering is a matured discipline, tracing its roots back to the early days of Security Operations Centers (SOCs). Originally, detection engineers or analysts primarily used Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) or Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) to respond to known threats.
For example, if a specific malware variant was identified in the wild, detection engineers would collect evidence, prototype, test, and deploy new rules within the IDS to catch future instances of the same threat. They dealt with Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) – meta-information about a threat, such as hashes or communication patterns around IPs and domains.
Over time, detection engineering has evolved to focus on Indicators of Attack (IOAs) and the behaviors of malware or threat tools. This evolution means that detection engineering now looks at specific system events, filenames, registry key modifications, and more. It is a planned, repeatable, and heavily automated process that uses logic-based rules to identify threats efficiently.
However, detection engineering is not without its limitations. Its reliance on known threat behaviors means it can miss unknown threats. Furthermore, setting up a robust detection engineering process can be a significant endeavor for organizations and security teams.
Threat Hunting: Uncovering the Unknown
Threat hunting is a separate discipline that, while having its origins around the same time as detection engineering, operates quite differently. Threat hunters delve into the unknown, seeking out anomalies or patterns in data that indicate potential threats.
Consider a threat hunter who notices an unusual pattern of login attempts on a server. They might then investigate this activity, examining logs and network traffic to determine if it represents a previously unknown threat. Unlike detection engineering, threat hunting is an ad hoc, creative, and primarily manual process.
Initially, threat hunting was heavily reliant on statistical analysis to identify anomalies. As the field has matured, the focus has shifted to identifying specific adversary behaviors, which can often cut through the perceived ‘noise’ in an environment.
While threat hunting can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, it provides several key benefits. It can identify threats unknown to existing detection mechanisms, uncover system misconfigurations or unknown network enclaves that can be rectified, and provide practitioners with a deep understanding of their network environment.
However, the outputs of threat hunting can be uncertain, not every hunt results in a true positive. Nonetheless, the findings from threat hunting often inform detection engineering, feeding into a continuous cycle of improvement for both disciplines.
A Complementary Relationship Between Detection Engineering and Threat Hunting
Despite their differences, detection engineering and threat hunting are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they are complementary practices. Findings from threat hunting often feed back into detection engineering, leading to improved detection rules. Similarly, alerts from detection systems can trigger threat hunts, providing a starting point for further investigation.
The Human Element
Although both disciplines require a deep understanding of systems and networks, the skills and training required for each can vary significantly. Detection engineers typically need strong analytical skills and a deep understanding of threat behaviors, while threat hunters often need to be more creative and intuitive, as they are dealing with unknown threats.
The metrics for success in detection engineering and threat hunting also differ. For detection engineering, it’s often about the speed and efficiency of threat detection. For threat hunting, success may be measured by the discovery of previously unknown threats or the identification of system weaknesses.
Detection Engineering and Threat Hunting – Conclusion
While these two disciplines are both central to the cybersecurity ecosystem, they serve different functions and require distinct approaches. Detection engineering relies on a systematic, logic-based process to identify and respond to known threats swiftly. It uses automation to enhance efficiency but may miss threats that are unknown or sufficiently novel.
On the other hand, threat hunting is an exploratory process that delves into the unknown, seeking out anomalies or patterns indicative of potential threats. It requires a high degree of creativity and manual work, focusing on behaviors that might signal a hidden adversary.
Both disciplines have their unique strengths and challenges, and they complement each other in practice. Discoveries from threat hunting can inform and improve detection engineering, leading to more robust defensive mechanisms. Meanwhile, detection engineering can provide a starting point for threat hunting, enabling a more targeted approach.
These two disciplines, in tandem, offer a comprehensive approach to cybersecurity, each addressing what the other cannot. Therefore, understanding the distinct roles and interplay of detection engineering and threat hunting is vital for any organization striving to fortify its cybersecurity posture.
If you want to try out behavioral threat hunting for yourself, sign up for a free HUNTER Community Account today!